Week 8 Reflection

The Twitter session this week was helpful for me, even though I didn’t contribute very much. This being my first research project, I am trying to take in the information my PLN is sharing. When I feel like I can contribute I do, but I feel like such a novice that I don’t always feel like I can contribute. I received constructive and positive comments on my blog. My PLN comments help me make my project better by adding ideas and feedback and help keep me focused. I appreciate how I can pose a thought, theory or question and my PLN give me ideas to help me make my research project better.

#seaccr Week 8: Preparing for data collection

In preparing for data collection I am collaborating with the teacher who has agreed to allow her students to use the iTalk app. When I am at her school I will be in the classroom, while the students are using the app, to assist with any technology problems. I have agreed to supply the teacher with the 3rd grade level reading passages. The first week of data collection I plan on showing the students how to use the iTalk app. I also plan to assess the students using AIMSWeb and the reading rubric I created. Each week I will use AIMSWeb to assess the student’s fluency scores. As I am writing this I am wondering if I should also make observational notes of those students who have difficulty using the app versus those who don’t. Then when I analyze my data I can see if there was a correlation between student’s scores with the students who needed help using the app. Or am I just adding another variable?

 

Most of my work will come when I’m analyzing the data. I don’t want to misrepresent data and/or skew my data with too many variables. The online article Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper listed nine elements to keep in mind when using quantitative methods. Some of the elements include explain the data collected, report unanticipated events, and use tables to provide exact values.   I will keep the nine elements in mind while analyzing my data.

 

On a related topic, I am thinking of changing my research question. Currently my question is:

Does using iTalk for repeated reading practice helping improve reading fluency by increasing rate, increasing accuracy, and improving expression?

I am thinking of changing it to:

After using the iTalk app did student’s fluency, accuracy and expression improve or decrease?

 

References:

USC Libraries. (2014, October 24). Organizing your social sciences research paper. Retrieved from http://libguides.usc.edu/content.php?pid=83009&sid=615867

 

Week 7 Reflection

This week I hosted the Twitter session. I was hoping someone would host with me, so I didn’t have to come up with questions by myself. However, no one else signed up to host so I was solo. I did have help/guidance from Dr. Lee. I emailed her to make sure I was on the right track as far as my questions were concerned. I felt the Twitter session was a success and it basically ran itself. My colleagues had questions for the Dr. Lee and Dr. Jones, so I sat back and let everyone ask their questions and I answered when I could help. If I felt a question needed to be asked, I would ask a question. Overall the Twitter session was helpful in helping figure out the next steps of the process and this week’s assignment. This week I have responded to my colleague’s projects. If I had any suggestions, I let them know in my comments. Mostly I think everyone is doing a good job and I am looking forward to see how the projects turn out.  I am so new to the research process that I feel ill-equipped to give advice on others projects, but I do try to add suggestions if one is needed. I have also received guidance from a few colleagues and some from my husband. I am feeling better about my research project again. Crocker has helped me revise my research question and understand the importance of my data and the variables I may encounter during my project. My husband helped me realize to keep working hard and move forward. As he stated, if everyone quit their research in the middle of their project no research would get done. I agree and I am moving forward.

#SEACCR Week 7: Research Proposal

Introduction

The focus of my research project is the impact elementary student’s reading fluency (rate, accuracy, and expression) scores when using the iTalk app to record and listen to their reading. The app iTalk is an iPod/iPad app that allows users to record their voice. My research discussed several strategies to teach and reinforce reading fluency skills. The strategy my project will focus on is repeated readings. According to Oakley (2003), repeated readings are one of the best methods to use to teach and reinforce reading fluency skills.

Research Question

Does using iTalk for repeated reading practice helping improve reading fluency by increasing rate, increasing accuracy, and improving expression?

Literature Review

Fluency is an integral skill for students and many believe reading fluency and comprehension are related. Reading fluency is a skill that needs to be taught through out a student’s elementary school years. Fluency instruction is crucial in elementary years, but has been found to be equally important beyond the elementary grades, even into high school, especially among students from low socioeconomic backgrounds (Rasinski, 2004).

Fluency is a reader’s ability to read fluidly with accuracy and appropriate pacing and expression.   If a student is incapable of reading fluently then the likelihood of comprehending what is read decreases. According to Rasinski (2004), “Reading fluency refers to the reader’s ability to develop control over surface-level text processing so that he or she can focus on understanding the deeper levels of meaning embedded in the text” (p.46). As students get older, students with poor fluency skills have difficulty with the reading required for academic success beyond their elementary years (Spear-Swerling, 2006).

Instruction in fluency depends on the individual student’s needs. It is important to assess each student individually. There are many ways to assess a student’s reading fluency. Many schools have started using an online reading assessment AIMSWeb. Students are given three grade level passages. For each passage a student’s reading is timed for 60 seconds. The person assessing the student keeps track of the words the student reads incorrectly (errors). The student’s errors are subtracted from the total number of words read giving the assessor a reading fluency score. After all three reading passages the best of the three scores is the one recorded. According to Rasinski (2004), listening to a student read a grade level passage and using a rubric that scores the students expression, phrasing, smoothness and pace is the best way to assess a student’s fluency. Rubrics assess the student’s fluency skill-by-skill not just words per minute. After a student is assessed then the instruction can begin. Rasinski (2006) suggests using repeated readings as one strategy to instruct students on reading fluency. After the teacher reads a passage aloud to students they are asked to following along silently then aloud as a group. Rasinski also suggests using a variety of passages i.e. reader’s theater, poems, speeches, and riddles. Oakley (2003) also states repeated reading is a beneficial strategy for teaching student’s to be fluent readers. “It is necessary to teach reading fluency explicitly because many children don’t just pick it up” (Oakley). Along with repeated reading Oakley also suggests modeling fluent reading and teaching self-monitoring to students. Listening to audio books and teacher read alouds are important for students to get a sense of pacing and expression. Students need to learn how to self monitor their reading. Having students record and listen to themselves helps them learn to monitor their reading.

Current technology is new and ever changing and this dynamic helps peak student interest, which in-turn increases student achievement. Many educators are continuously looking for modern ways to utilize technology to motivate students. According to Sklar (2009), Aliso Elementary School in Orange County piloted an iEngage program that gave 5th graders in the pilot class an Apple iPod. The teacher was hoping to use the iPods to help increase her student’s reading fluency. She noticed that her students were more engaged and more excited to learn when they were allowed to use the iPod. In Sklar’s article she interviewed a student who mentioned the app that helped him the most was iTalk for fluency because he could hear how he read. The student noticed the more he used iTalk his reading improved. He also enjoyed using iTalk to listen to his reading improvements.

Fluency is a skill that needs to be taught, modeled and practiced during and sometimes beyond elementary school. Technology can help engage students and increase fluency rates. Using apps like iTalk that allow students to record themselves reading, while practicing their pacing, expression, and accuracy allow students to listen to themselves and helps increase their fluency rates.

Method

Participants

The participants for this action research project a 3rd grade class of 24 students. The school is a Title I school on an army base, because the school is on a military base they have a large percentage of students move in and out of the school. Data was collected on the students who were enrolled at the school at the start of the study.

Materials

We will use iPads and iPods with the app iTalk. Students will also use headphones to listen to their recordings. To assess the student’s rate and accuracy we will use AIMSweb. To assess the student’s expression we will use a rating rubric. The data collection will continue for a period of four weeks.

Procedure

The data of student’s AIMSweb fluency scores and expression using the expression rubric will be collected prior to using iTalk to get a baseline score. The students will be shown how to use the iTalk app to record reading a grade level passage. We will be in the room to assist students with using the technology. Students will be given a new grade level passage each week. After recording their reading students will listen to their recording. Each student will use the iTalk app twice a week to read, record and listen. This data collection and analysis period will take approximately four weeks.

Analysis

We will look at the student’s rate of increase of reading rate and accuracy over a four-week time period prior to using the iTalk app and after the use of the iTalk app. Students will rate their expression using a rating rubric; we will also rate the student’s expression over a four-week time period after the use of the iTalk app.

iTalk Reading Expression Rubric

Name:                                                 Date:                        

0 1 2
Volume

I can’t hear myself properly.

I don’t read loud enough to hear all the text. I read loud enough to hear all the text.
Pace

I read too quickly or too slowly.

I mostly read at the same speed all the way through. I read at the right pace to make it easy to listen to.
Pause

I don’t look for punctuation when I read.

I sometimes use punctuation when I’m reading. I use punctuation to pause and stop at the right places.
Clarity

I stumble over lots of words or mumble lots of words.

I mostly read clearly with a few stumbles. I read each word clearly.
Phrasing

My voice is boring with no highs or lows. I read like a robot.

I use some highs or lows to add life to a text. I use expression in my voice to make the text ‘come alive’.
Smoothness

My reading is choppy and doesn’t flow smoothly from word to word.

Some of my reading flows and some is choppy.

I read so the text flows smoothly.
Total:               /12

References

Oakley, G. (2003). Improving oral reading fluency (and comprehension) through the

creation of talking books. Reading Online, 6(7), n7. Retrieved from http://www.readingonline.org/articles/Oakley/

Rasinski, T. (2004). Creating fluent readers. Educational Leadership, 61(6), 46-51.

Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/mar04/vol61/num06/Creating-Fluent-Readers.aspx

Sklar, D. (2009). Legendary local: Saddleback teacher issues ipod touch to students.

News-n-Views. Retrieved from http://www.news-n-views.com/asp/articlenews.asp?art_id=3676&internal=1&issue_date=10/11/2009&place=0648256&edent=8853059

Spear-Swerling, L. (2006). Preventing and remediating difficulties with reading fluency.

WETA. Retrieved from  http://www.ldonline.org/spearswerling/Preventing_and_Remediating_Difficulties_with_Reading_Fluency

Week 6 Relfection

I am appreciative that the assignments are being broken down into steps, so that for each assignment I am creating a piece of the end product. This week’s Twitter helped me start thinking about how and why I want to assess and collect the data for my project. I have always known that I would use AIMSweb as the final assessment to collect student’s fluency scores. After the Twitter discussion I started thinking about the data of asking the students how they felt about using iTalk to practice repeated readings. I am wondering if students will feel that using iTalk helped their reading or not. However, after reading comments about my blog this week now I am second guessing whether asking students has relevance or not.   As the week ended and I completed my assignments I felt I was heading in the right direction. Then I start thinking about all the variables in my project, how will account for tech use over teacher instruction? How will I account for reading increasing because students are being read to at home or not? But how will any of us? Those colleagues looking at student engagement how will they know engagement increased because of the use of the technology versus the topic being taught versus the time of day. I could really use some guidance, because I think I have misunderstood the task at hand.

 

#SEACCR Week 6: Theoretical Framework and Research Question

Theoretical Framework:

The literature revealed three overall themes. First, fluency is an integral skill for students. Second, fluency is a skill that needs to be taught, modeled and practiced during and sometimes beyond elementary school. Lastly, repeated readings are an important strategy used to increase a student’s reading fluency.

Research Question:

The purpose of this case study is to look at the effect of using the app iTalk to increase reading fluency scores.   Students will record themselves reading a passage, then listen to themselves read in the attempt to increase reading fluency scores.  Does student use of the iTalk app to record and listen to reading passages help increase reading fluency?